F

Clarification on Crescendo vs Avalanche C-Chain

Summary

The user is seeking clarification on the differences between the Crescendo upgrade and Avalanche’s C-Chain, expressing difficulty in understanding these distinctions despite reviewing documentation. They are a developer working on a media dapp project and note that the Crescendo upgrade will provide an EVM equivalent environment and update Flow's Cadence Language to version 1.0. The user highlights that the main benefit for Solidity developers is the ability to utilize Cadence's features to enhance their projects. They question how this differs from Avalanche C-Chain or other layer 2 projects, particularly regarding the necessity for dapps to support the Flow chain and whether the user experience will be distinct from other L2s. The user seeks an explanation of how the user experience on Flow differs from other L2s and what advantages Flow offers, as they need to present this information to their team. They also mention that Flow EVM provides benefits such as proposer-builder separation, on-chain randomness, MEV resilience, and account abstraction, allowing for interoperability between Cadence and EVM runtime.

Status
open
Tags
    Source
    #🛠│developer-questions